“Throughout the course of the investigation, I spoke with every of the Justices, a number of on a number of events. The Justices actively cooperated on this iterative course of, asking questions and answering mine,” Curley stated.
Curley urged that there was no “credible” info pointing to any of the justices or their spouses as sources for POLITICO’s story final Could disclosing the draft opinion and reporting that the courtroom was poised to overturn the federal constitutional proper to abortion acknowledged in Roe v. Wade virtually 50 years in the past.
“I adopted up on all credible leads, none of which implicated the Justices or their spouses. On this foundation, I didn’t imagine that it was essential to ask the Justices to signal sworn affidavits,” Curley stated.
Whereas Curley’s investigation didn’t determine anybody who might be thought of by a preponderance of proof to be answerable for the disclosure, a number of legislation clerks indicated that they had mentioned with their spouses the draft opinion and the vote depend within the pending case, Dobbs v. Jackson Ladies’s Well being Group. The courtroom formalized the draft opinion from Justice Samuel Alito in almost equivalent kind about seven weeks after POLITICO’s report, with 5 justices voting to overrule Roe and 4 dissenting from that place.