A former JPMorgan Chase & Co. compliance government has sued the financial institution for retaliation, saying it fired her after she identified gaps in its anticorruption controls and raised issues about what she believed had been misrepresentations to regulators.
a former JPMorgan vice chairman, mentioned in a lawsuit filed Thursday that amongst her issues was whether or not the financial institution’s conduct violated phrases of settlements it reached with the U.S. Justice Division and the U.S. Securities and Trade Fee in 2016.
Ms. Williams joined JPMorgan’s international anticorruption compliance group in New York in July 2018 and was fired in November 2019 for what the financial institution deemed efficiency points, in line with her lawsuit’s grievance filed in federal courtroom in Manhattan.
A JPMorgan spokeswoman didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark. Legal professionals for Ms. Williams declined to remark additional on her claims.
At JPMorgan, Ms. Williams was primarily accountable for managing and assessing the financial institution’s third-party middleman program, in line with her grievance. Throughout her time on the financial institution, the grievance mentioned Ms. Williams recognized quite a few issues with this system, together with an absence of insurance policies and procedures associated to the apply of exempting some third events from the financial institution’s compliance guidelines and an absence of controls over third-party invoices.
She additionally raised issues concerning the financial institution’s monitoring and testing, due diligence critiques, and coaching and reporting processes, in line with the grievance. Moreover, the grievance mentioned Ms. Williams believed the financial institution in the end misled regulators and the Justice Division concerning the state of its compliance program.
JPMorgan in 2016 agreed to pay $264 million to U.S. authorities for violating anticorruption legal guidelines. The settlements stemmed from an alleged scheme to win banking offers by awarding prestigious jobs to relations and mates of Chinese language authorities officers.
The financial institution on the time entered into an administrative settlement with the SEC and a nonprosecution settlement with the Justice Division below which it agreed to report back to officers for a three-year interval on its efforts to strengthen its compliance program.
Ms. Williams in Could 2019 reviewed a draft of a report meant to replace the Justice Division on JPMorgan’s compliance with the nonprosecution settlement, in line with her grievance. Her grievance mentioned the draft report made quite a few misrepresentations, together with claims by the financial institution that it had a risk-ranking methodology and bill controls when it didn’t.
The grievance additionally mentioned the U.Okay.’s Monetary Conduct Authority requested JPMorgan for an inventory of third-parties the financial institution had terminated over corruption issues. The financial institution didn’t preserve such an inventory, in line with the grievance, and needed to scramble to reply primarily based on what Ms. Williams described as “guesswork.”
Ms. Williams initially raised her issues to her direct supervisors in JPMorgan’s anticorruption unit, contacted extra senior executives, filed written complaints with the financial institution’s human assets division and ultimately met with a lawyer on the financial institution’s whistleblower authorized group, the grievance mentioned. It added that the financial institution tried to cease her from submitting her complaints internally, after which retaliated in opposition to her by giving her inaccurate efficiency critiques and eradicating her from her duties.
Ms. Williams’s grievance argued that elevating issues concerning the financial institution’s compliance program was protected below a legislation shielding whistleblowers from retaliation.
Write to Dylan Tokar at email@example.com
Copyright ©2021 Dow Jones & Firm, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8