The U.S. authorities is trying into whether or not
com Inc. might need misled lenders about its office security file to acquire credit score, utilizing a regulation stemming from the savings-and-loan disaster in a authorized transfer a lawyer for the corporate referred to as “unprecedented.”
The Manhattan U.S. Legal professional’s Workplace is conducting an investigation into Amazon below the Monetary Establishments Reform, Restoration and Enforcement Act, a regulation that enables civil instances to be introduced over wrongdoing that impacts banks. The workplace has deployed the 1989 regulation on the identical time the Labor Division presses a office security investigation of Amazon that has already led to a number of citations.
The Labor Division in December cited Amazon at six of its warehouses for not adequately reporting accidents and this week cited three firm services, saying employees had been uncovered to ergonomic or tools hazards.
Amazon has mentioned it intends to enchantment the citations. The corporate additionally mentioned it by no means deliberately misrepresented its security file.
As a result of Firrea instances proceed below civil regulation the federal government can extra simply show claims than in a legal prosecution, which requires juries to be satisfied of prices past an affordable doubt.
The U.S. Legal professional’s Workplace in Manhattan issued a subpoena in August to Amazon for data the corporate might need shared with monetary establishments concerned in a minimum of $90 million in contracts or agreements with the web retailer within the earlier 5 years, particularly data it shared on its damage charges and labor regulation compliance.
An Amazon unit final month challenged the subpoena and associated subpoenas in federal court docket in Seattle.
“It’s obscure how a security inquiry may plausibly be shoehorned right into a Firrea investigation,” Zainab Ahmad, a companion at exterior counsel Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, wrote in a letter to authorities attorneys that’s included with court docket papers.
“Firrea addresses monetary fraud, not worker security,” Ms. Ahmad added, calling the U.S. Legal professional’s Workplace’s authorized principle “extraordinarily tenuous” and “unprecedented.”
The workplace is looking for a variety of paperwork on Amazon’s labor practices, together with inner communications pertaining to insurance policies round office productiveness. The workplace additionally desires video surveillance footage of Amazon services and has served subpoenas to take testimony from Amazon staff, together with high-level executives, based on Ms. Ahmad.
Amazon in court docket papers within the case in Seattle mentioned the data calls for are “unrealistic” and the U.S. Legal professional’s Workplace stretched to say jurisdiction below Firrea.
Whereas the regulation was meant to focus on insiders who looted savings-and-loan establishments, it has been utilized in novel methods by authorities attorneys, mentioned
a companion on the regulation agency Sullivan & Cromwell LLP who has labored on Firrea-related litigation.
“The Justice Division has a historical past of misusing the Firrea statute and stretching it far past its supposed functions,” he added.
Firrea emerged as a “superweapon” for the U.S. Justice Division following the 2008 monetary disaster, when it was used to deliver instances in opposition to banks themselves, mentioned Brian Feldman, a lawyer previously with the civil fraud unit of the U.S. Legal professional’s Workplace in Manhattan who now could be in personal observe at Harter Secrest & Emery LLP.
Mr. Feldman, who labored on Firrea-related instances throughout his time within the workplace, mentioned that whereas the Amazon case entails a “novel set of circumstances,” Firrea is written to permit the federal government to sort out quite a lot of fraud affecting banks.
Any fraud case in opposition to Amazon would activate whether or not the corporate had made misrepresentations to lenders and whether or not these misrepresentations impacted their decision-making, he mentioned.
A spokesman for the U.S. Legal professional’s Workplace in Manhattan didn’t reply to a request for data on the identities of the monetary establishments whose dealings with Amazon are below scrutiny.
Write to Richard Vanderford at Richard.Vanderford@wsj.com
Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Firm, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8